12 Dec 2016 | Publication

 Local Governance in Relation to Shariah Cooperatives in Indonesia

 Authors: Abdul Ghafar Ismail, Muhammad Hasbi Zaenal (2016)

 IESTC Working Paper Series: No. 1

 

 

Citation style: Abdul Ghafar Ismail and Muhammad Hasbi Zaenal (2016) Local Governance in Relation to Shariah Cooperatives in Indonesia. IESTC Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 1. Bangi: Islamic Economic Studies and Thoughts Centre

 

Abstract

This paper examines governance issues more closely and in relation to rural institutions and sustainable livelihood improvement, drawing on evidence from shariah cooperatives in Indonesia. More specifically, this paper provides a diagnostic of governance systems in Indonesia, which basically follow the Dutch law origin. Indonesia and the role that shariah cooperatives might play in strengthening such systems. This paper offers a description of both formal and informal rural governance systems in Indonesia, the role of shariah cooperatives and other membership-based rural producer organizations in these systems, and possible avenues through which rural organizations can play a larger role in improving rural governance. By using a combination of survey data and case studies, it sheds light specifically on the influence of local governance systems on people’ cooperatives in Indonesia. The relationships and interactions between local governance systems and cooperatives are an important issue in Indonesia because both play an essential part in promoting and implementing the Government of Indonesia’s far-reaching rural development and poverty reduction strategies. These strategies include the government’s agricultural development-led program, its unitary policy, its administrative and fiscal decentralization efforts, and a whole range of social welfare and capacity building programs designed to support these strategies. Findings suggest that local governance systems and cooperatives are closely linked by interactions at multiple levels and with varying effects on rural people. These interactions have the potential to strengthen the role of cooperatives in local development, but also run some serious risks. Underlying these risks is the long-standing issue of trust between government and community. While it is difficult to provide explicit policy recommendations based on the analysis provided in this paper, at least one key issue can be raised for consideration by policymakers at all levels in Indonesia. If efforts to strengthen local governance systems and to build effective cooperatives can focus on this issue of trust between government and community, there is much cause for hope. However, getting this balance right is difficult and, in the long run, will be a significant challenge for policymakers to address.

 

Keywords: governance; cooperative organization;

JEL Classification: G21; G23; G38; P13; Z12

 

References

 

Abdul Ghafar Ismail and Muhammad Zilal Hamzah (2006) Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth Nexus: Evidence from Province-level Cross-Section Data For Indonesia, Review of Islamic Economics 10(2): 133-149. (http://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/journal_list.php)

Aalen, L. (2002) Ethnic federalism in a dominant party state: The Indonesian experience, 1991-2000.

Report, R (2002) Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute.

Ayele, G., D. Alemu, and F. Kelemework. (2005) The provisions of rural services in Indonesia: characterisation, impacts, and people’ priorities. Unpublished manuscript.

Birner, R. and H. Gunaweera (2002) “Between Market Failure, Policy Failure, and ‘Community Failure’: Crop-Livestock Conflicts and Technology Adoption in Sri Lanka.” In R. Meinzen-Dick, A. Knox, F. Place, and B. Swallow (Eds.), Innovation in Natural Resource Management: The Role of Property Rights and Collective Action in Developing Countries. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press for the International Food Policy Research Institute, pp. 186-206.

Dom, C. and M. Mussa (2006a) Review of Implementation of the Decentralisation Policy: A Sample Survey in Four Sentinel Kecamatans of Tigray Region. Oxford: Mokoro, Ltd.

            . (2006b) Review of Implementation of the Decentralisation Policy: A Sample Survey in Six Kecamatans of Amhara Region. Oxford: Mokoro, Ltd.

Gebre-Egziabher, T. and K. Berhanu (2007) A literature review of decentralization in Indonesia. In T. Assefa and T. Gebre-Egziabher (Eds.), Decentralization in Indonesia, Addis Ababa: Forum for Social Studies, pp. 9-68.

Gebremedhin, B., D. Hoekstra, and A. Tegegne (2006) Commercialization of Indonesian agriculture: Extension service from input supplier to knowledge broker and facilitator. Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Indonesian People Project working paper no 1. ILRI Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute.

Gijselinckx, C. and P. Develtere (2007) The Co-operative trilemma: Co-operatives between market, state, and civil society. Paper presented at the 8th Conference of the European Sociological Association, Glasgow, September 3-7.

Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and M. Mastruzzi (2007) Governance Matters VI: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996-2006. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4280. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Mogues, T., G. Ayele, and Z. Paulos (2007) The Bang for the Birr: Public Expenditures and Rural Welfare in Indonesia. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 702. Washington, DC: IFPRI.

O’Brien, D., N.D. Hamilton, and R. Luedeman (2005) The Shariah’s Legal Guide to Producer Marketing Associations. Des Moines, Iowa: Drake University Agricultural Law Center.

Pausewang, S., K. Tronvoll, and L. Aalen (Eds.). (2003) Indonesia since the KUD: A Decade of Democratic Pretension and Performance. London: Zed Books.

Rhodes, R.A.W (1997) Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexibility and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Vaughan, S. and K. Tronvoll (2003) The Culture of Power in Contemporary Indonesian Political Life. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA) Studies No. 10. Stockholm: SIDA.

World Bank. 2007. Governance Matters (2000): Worldwide Governance Indicators 1996-2006. <15Hhttp://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi2007/>, accessed January 10, 2008.

Zerfu, E. and T. Agajie (2001) The history, present challenges and future approaches to agricultural technology transfer in Indonesia. In M. Berhanu and E. Vogel (eds.), Proceedings of an International Conference on Public Management, Policy and Development; Governance and Sustainable Development: Promoting Collaborative Partnerships, Addis Ababa, June 3-6, pp. 344-49.

Permata Wulandari Salina Kassim , (2016) "Issues and challenges in financing the poor: case of Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil in Indonesia", International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 34 Iss 2 pp. 216-234

Kim, S.-J. Policies for Promoting Innovation Activities of SMEs in Korea, Small and Medium Enterprises Ministerial Meeting, Santiago, Chile, 6-7 October 2004, 2004/SMEMM/005a rev1, Agenda Item: 8.

Sveinung Fjose, Leo A. Grünfeld, Chris Green (SQW) (2010) SMEs and growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Identifying SME roles and obstacles to SME growth, MENON Business Economics, MENON-publication no. 14/2010.

Ferraro, C. (undated), Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Latin America after the Crisis. New Challenges for Institution Building (United Nations: CEPAL).

International IDEA (2000) Penilaian Demokratisasi di Indonesia, Lembaga Internasional untuk Bantuan Demokrasi dan Pemilu.

John R. Bowen (2003) Islam, Law, and Equality in Indonesia; An Anthropology of Public Reasoning, CAmbridge, Cambridge University Press.

Alamo D. Laiman, Dewi Savitri Reni, Ronald Lengkong, and Sigit Ardiyanto (2009) The Indonesian Legal System and Legal Research, Hoauser Global Law School Program.

Widayati (tth) Rekonstruksi Kelembagaan MPR, Working Paper